Skip to main content
Clean Best logo
Menu
Call 02 5839 30120485 000 860

Revesby NSW 2212

Comparing two cleaning quotes built on different assumptions in Revesby

Two quotes for the same building can differ by a third and both be honest. The gap is almost never in the hourly rate. It is in what each one assumed about frequency, periodic work, consumables and the areas nobody mentioned during the site visit.

Request a fixed quote Call 02 5839 3012

In short

Quotes become comparable only when they answer the same questions. For a Revesby premises that means a common scope stating the areas, the frequencies, the periodic items and their intervals, who supplies consumables, and what is excluded. Without that, comparison is guesswork dressed as procurement.

Clean Best prices against a written scope produced from an inspection, with the assumptions visible rather than embedded. Where a client is comparing proposals, that structure makes it straightforward to see where two figures differ and whether the difference is in coverage or in rate.

The four places the difference usually hides

Frequency is the first: one quote assumes three attendances a week and another assumes five, and neither says so prominently. Periodic work is the second, since a proposal excluding floor treatment and high-level dusting looks considerably cheaper until those items are needed. Consumables are the third, and they can represent a meaningful sum over a year. Excluded areas are the fourth and the least visible.

Checking those four accounts for most of the variance between proposals. A quote that appears twenty per cent lower frequently turns out to cover four attendances rather than five, exclude all periodic work, and assume the client supplies consumables. None of that is dishonest. It simply means the two documents are describing different arrangements and cannot be compared on price alone. The remedy is not suspicion of the cheaper proposal but a common scope that makes the two describe the same thing.

Issuing a common scope before asking for prices

The most effective step a procurement officer can take is to write the scope themselves, or have one written, and issue it to everyone. It does not need to be elaborate: the areas, the frequencies wanted, the periodic items, the consumable arrangement and the access constraints. Half a dozen pages is usually enough and it makes every subsequent comparison meaningful.

Where a contractor believes the scope is wrong, they should say so and price an alternative alongside the requested one. That is more useful than a silent substitution, and it surfaces genuine expertise. A proposal that quotes exactly what was asked, plus a note explaining why one frequency should differ, tells a client far more than a document that quietly assumes something else.

Questions that reveal how a price was built

Asking how many attendance hours the price assumes is more revealing than asking for an hourly rate. So is asking what happens when an area is inaccessible, how additional work is priced, and what the proposal assumes about the building's current condition. Answers to those three questions usually explain most of the difference between two figures.

It is also worth asking what is not included. A proposal with an explicit exclusions list is generally more considered than one without, because writing exclusions requires having thought about the boundaries. A document that appears to include everything usually has not been examined closely enough, and the gaps emerge as variations in the first quarter. Exclusions are also the part a client can most easily verify against their own knowledge of the building.

Comparing cleaning proposals for a Revesby site

  • A common written scope issued to every party before pricing
  • Attendance frequency stated explicitly in each proposal
  • Periodic items and their intervals listed, not implied
  • Consumable supply responsibility confirmed in writing
  • Assumed attendance hours requested from each contractor
  • An explicit exclusions list required in every proposal
Clean Best team reviewing hygiene tasks in a Blacktown facility

Working in Revesby and the Canterbury-Bankstown

Revesby in Canterbury-Bankstown holds industrial premises, retail, offices and service businesses, a mix that produces buildings with genuinely different cleaning requirements sitting close together under similar management. Occupiers of that scale often buy cleaning infrequently and compare proposals without a common scope, which makes price the only visible variable even when the underlying arrangements differ substantially. Writing the scope before seeking prices costs a morning and changes the quality of every response received. Clean Best services Revesby from Seven Hills and prices against an inspected written scope.

Questions about Revesby

Should we always choose the lowest price?

Only where the scopes are genuinely identical, which is rarer than it appears. A lower figure covering fewer attendances or excluding periodic work is not a saving, it is a smaller purchase. Comparing on price is reasonable once the coverage has been made equivalent, and that requires a common scope rather than a reading of each proposal's own description. The comparison is only fair once both proposals describe the same building on the same terms.

How do we write a scope without cleaning expertise?

Start with the building rather than the tasks. List the areas, note who uses each and how heavily, record access constraints and identify anything unusual. That much can be produced by anyone who knows the premises. Contractors can then propose frequencies against it, and their reasoning becomes a visible part of what is being compared.

What if contractors propose different frequencies?

That is useful information rather than a problem, provided each states its assumption. A contractor recommending a lower frequency with a reason is offering an opinion worth considering. One assuming a lower frequency without saying so is presenting a cheaper figure for a different arrangement, which is the situation a common scope prevents.

Are fixed prices better than hourly rates?

For ongoing work, usually, because a fixed price against a defined scope transfers the estimating risk to the contractor and gives the client a predictable figure. Hourly arrangements suit variable or unpredictable work. What causes difficulty is a fixed price against an undefined scope, since neither party can say later what was actually included.

How should additional work be priced in the agreement?

With a stated mechanism agreed at the outset rather than negotiated each time. Whether that is a schedule of rates, an hourly figure for ad hoc work or a quote-per-item approach matters less than it being written down. Arrangements without a mechanism tend to produce either reluctance to request extras or unpredictable invoices.

Related pages

Get a fixed written quote for Revesby

Free walkthrough, scope in writing, price back within 24 hours.

Request a quote
Call nowEmail us