Skip to main content
Clean Best logo
Menu
Call 02 5839 30120485 000 860

Hurstville NSW 2220

Separating strata common property from tenancy scope in Hurstville buildings

In a strata building, two separate budgets are paying two separate contractors to clean areas that meet at a doorway nobody has looked at closely. That doorway is where most of the friction lives, and it is entirely fixable on paper.

Request a fixed quote Call 02 5839 3012

In short

A facility plan in a Hurstville strata building distinguishes common property, which the owners corporation funds through levies, from lot property, which each occupier funds directly. The plan lists every area against one of those categories, names the boundary at each junction and states what happens where a surface genuinely serves both.

Clean Best can hold either scope or both, kept separately priced so a change on one side does not disturb the other. The proposal follows an inspection, records the boundary decisions in writing and identifies anything that will need a strata committee decision before it can be included.

Where the line actually falls in practice

The registered plan settles ownership but not cleaning practice, and the two rarely align neatly. An entry door might be common property while the mat inside it is not. A lobby floor may run continuously under a tenancy threshold with no visible change of finish. A glass line may be cleaned externally by the building and internally by the occupier, which produces an obviously half-clean result if nobody has coordinated the timing.

Walking each junction and writing down what happens on either side takes an hour and prevents most of the recurring disputes. The useful output is not a legal opinion but a practical statement: this side to here, that side from there, glass cleaned in the same week by both parties. Where the answer is genuinely unclear, it is flagged for the committee rather than decided informally by whoever is standing there.

Common property areas that are easy to under-scope

Lobbies and lifts get attention because they are visible. The areas that quietly deteriorate are fire stairs, plant room approaches, bin rooms, car park circulation and the external approach from the street. None of these has an obvious owner among the occupants, and all of them are common property. A scope that lists only the presentation areas leaves the building carrying a growing backlog in the spaces nobody walks through deliberately.

Each of these deserves its own frequency rather than a shared periodic mention. Fire stairs may need a monthly pass and a quarterly detail. Bin rooms need washing rather than sweeping. Car park areas need a defined sweep and a separate arrangement for spills. Listing them individually also gives the committee something to adjust when the levy is under pressure, rather than an undifferentiated common area figure.

Reporting into a committee rather than a manager

A strata committee makes decisions at intervals and often changes composition, which is different from reporting to a facility manager who sees the building daily. The reporting format should reflect that. A short written record tied to the scope, produced at the same interval as committee meetings, is more useful than frequent detail that nobody reads between meetings.

It also helps to record which decisions have already been made and why. A committee that turns over will otherwise revisit the same questions about frequency, bin rooms and external areas every couple of years. Keeping those decisions attached to the plan gives a new committee context, and gives the strata manager something to point to when a query arrives from an owner.

Boundary decisions for a Hurstville strata building

  • Every area categorised as common property or lot property
  • Each junction walked and the boundary written down
  • Glass cleaning coordinated between both sides in the same week
  • Fire stairs, bin rooms and car park given their own frequencies
  • Reporting interval aligned to committee meetings
  • Past decisions recorded with the plan for incoming committees
Clean Best team reviewing hygiene tasks in a Blacktown facility

Working in Hurstville and the St George

Hurstville in the St George area combines offices, shopping centres, healthcare premises and a large stock of high-density buildings, many of which place commercial tenancies beneath residential or mixed levels under a single strata scheme. Those buildings concentrate several categories of user in one structure, and the boundary between what the owners corporation funds and what an occupier funds is crossed dozens of times in a single circulation route. Writing it down once is far cheaper than arbitrating it repeatedly. Clean Best services Hurstville from Seven Hills and agrees attendance times against realistic travel.

Questions about Hurstville

Can one contractor hold both the strata and tenancy scopes?

Yes, and it removes the coordination problem at boundaries entirely. The two remain separately scoped and separately invoiced, because they are funded by different parties and may change independently. Holding both simply means the same team crosses the boundary with a single set of instructions rather than two contractors meeting at a threshold neither has been told about.

Who decides frequency for common property?

The owners corporation, usually acting through the strata committee and the strata manager. The cleaning plan's role is to make the choice informed, by setting out what each frequency covers and what a reduction would actually mean in the affected areas. Presenting options against specific areas is more useful to a committee than presenting a single total figure to accept or reject.

What about areas used only by one tenancy?

An area that is common property but used almost exclusively by one occupier is a common source of dispute. The practical approach is to record the usage pattern, keep the area in the common scope where ownership says it belongs, and let the committee decide whether any recovery is appropriate. The cleaning arrangement should not be the mechanism for resolving a cost-sharing question.

How are extra requests from individual owners handled?

Through the strata manager or the nominated contact, not directly. An owner asking a cleaner on site to do something outside the scope displaces work the levy has already paid for. The plan names the single instructing party, and requests from elsewhere are redirected there. That protects both the schedule and the contractor from being caught between competing instructions.

Do you attend committee meetings?

Attendance can be arranged where a committee wants to discuss the scope directly, and it is often useful at the point of setting or reviewing frequencies. For routine reporting a short written record aligned to the meeting cycle is usually sufficient. What matters more than attendance is that the record refers to the same zones and areas the scope uses.

Related pages

Get a fixed written quote for Hurstville

Free walkthrough, scope in writing, price back within 24 hours.

Request a quote
Call nowEmail us